Thursday, January 16, 2014

Ask Your Trainer Thursday

Q:  How do I determine what my  proper 'weight' should be.Which of the markers should you be using 

A: There are many "markers" to determine weight, the most popular of which seems to be the scale. Americans are obsessed with the numbers on the scale and losing "weight".  Unfortunately, this is the absolute WORST  way to assess your progress on a weight loss or fitness goal and even worse for determining an "appropriate" weight.  Muscle is so much denser than fat that you could conceivably lose 5 - 10  pounds of fat and replace it with muscle and go down an entire dress size without the scale moving much if at all. 

That's not to say that the scale doesn't have it's uses. Weight does impact your body's BMR , calorie needs and weight loss or maintenance formulas. For clients with more than 50  pounds to lose, it is a decent indicator or progress and adherence to food plan  however,  I use it as a tertiary method of measuring progress. 

  The old method of weight based on "height and age" does not take into account bone structure or the higher amount of lean muscle found in people engaged in resistance training.In consults, the only thing I use the number on the scale for is to determine pounds of muscle and fat and BMR.

 To give an example, when I was lifting weights 3 or 4 days a week  and doing yoga and Pilates, the scale weighed me at 112 pounds. My bodyfat was 14% and I wore a size 00 (I have small bones and am only 5'4). That's my body in the picture above.  When I started doing triathlons 5 years ago, dropped my weight training to 2 days a week and replaced it with running, biking and swimming,  I lost 5 pounds on the scale but my bodyfat went UP to 18% and I went UP a dress size.



The most effective way to asses your proper weight would be to measure your body fat . I could write an entire blog on the many ways to do so but for our purposes, electric calipers in the hands of a qualified fitness professional is the best because it measures cm of  fat in predetermined areas and is not effected by things like hydration or un- eliminated food. 

The most popular and easiest is what's known as bio electrical impedance.   I've included the Wikipedia page for a full exploitation and how to make your results the most accurate. Gyms generally use handheld versions like the one shown and many people have "scale" type versions for use in home.  I would add, make sure you are always doing it at the same time on the same day each week and that  your hydration level is constant. 
 

 So, the actual answer to the question is: 
  1. Ditch the scale as a determinant of what your "proper weight" should be?
  2. Determine your body fat
  3. Determine where you fall into the below categories.
  4. Calculate  your pounds of muscle and pounds of fat.
    ex: 107 X 18% body fat = 19.26 lbs of fat, 87.74 lbs of muscle (lbm)
  5. Determine where you want to be  
  6. Calculate how many pounds of fat you need to lose to reach that % WITHOUT a reduction of muscle (lbm)
  7. Factor in any pounds of muscle you want to gain and adjust the weight accordingly


Do you need help figuring out where to even start with your diet or fitness program?

Want more support, motivation and accountability or a structured program that guarantees results? 


Do you want to be one of the  50% who hasn't abandoned their resolution by Feb 6th or one of the 33% who is living in the body of their dreams instead of looking back at another failed year of resolutions?

Do you want to see your body change every month and have fun in the process?


Join one of our Group Fitness Camps or Schedule your Consultation for your free fitness evaluation TODAY !!  


Have a question you would like answered? Submit it HERE


In Health,

Dianne
www.mypersonalfitnesscoach.com


ps.If you found this useful, I'd appreciate a +1 or a share on FB or Twitter
pps.   Join our facebook community for accountability and motivation and follow us on twitter for news, research and other tidbits  which don't always make their  way into the blog 


No comments: